Accounting firm · Quality

Engagement file quality review

Review completed engagement files the same way every time, so findings lead to fixes instead of sitting in a reviewer's notes. Each review records the checklist, the findings and the preparer's response, and a quality partner signs off the outcome.

  • Duration: 2 to 4 weeks
  • How often: For each file picked for review, every quarter
  • Steps: 8 steps
  • AI agents: 1 AI agent
  • Approvals: 1 approval

Free plan, no credit card needed.

What changes with this template

Without it

  1. File reviews happen when someone has time, and nobody knows which files were looked at.

  2. Findings sit in the reviewer's notes, and the preparer hears about them months later.

  3. Nobody checks whether the fixes were made.

  4. The same findings come back every year.

With it

  1. Each review is a run, with the file, the reviewer and the rating on record.

  2. The preparer gets a written report and responds to each finding.

  3. The review stays open until the quality partner agrees the actions and the fixes are recorded.

  4. Recurring findings go into the firm's checklists and training.

The template, step by step

Each step says who does it: someone on your team, an AI agent, or the client through a shared link. An approval keeps every later step locked until it is given.

  • Done by your team
  • Done by an AI agent
  1. Starts when

    A completed engagement file is picked for review. The quality partner starts a run with the client, the engagement and the preparer.

  2. 1

    Pick the file and assign a reviewer

    Week 1

    Quality partner · Team

    Pick the file to review, assign a reviewer who did not work on it, and share the link to the file with them.

    Checklist

    • Reviewer did not work on the file
    • Link to the file shared with the reviewer

    Fields to fill in

    • Client and engagement (required)
    • Engagement type (required)
    • Preparer (required)
    • Reviewer (required)
  3. 2

    Review the file against the checklist

    Weeks 1 to 2

    Reviewer · Team

    Work through the firm's review checklist for this engagement type, and record each finding with its severity and the fix you ask for.

    Checklist

    • Engagement letter covers the work done
    • Acceptance checks on file
    • Working papers support the figures
    • Review and sign-off recorded

    Fields to fill in

    • Link to the engagement file (required)
    • Findings (required)
    • Overall rating (required)
  4. 3

    Draft the findings report

    Week 2

    Findings writer · AI agent

    The findings writer turns the reviewer's findings into a short report for the preparer: what was done well, and each finding with its severity and the fix asked for.

    Fields to fill in

    • Draft findings report (required)

    Checked by: The reviewer corrects the report in step 4 before it goes to the preparer.

  5. 4

    Check and send the findings report

    Week 2

    Reviewer · Team

    Correct the draft so every finding is accurate and fairly worded, then send it to the preparer.

    Checklist

    • Every finding included
    • Severity matches the review
    • Wording is factual

    Fields to fill in

    • Date sent to the preparer (required)
  6. 5

    Respond to the findings

    Week 3

    Preparer · Team

    Agree or explain each finding, and say how and when you will fix it, on this file or on the next one.

    Fields to fill in

    • Response to the findings (required)
    • Fixes needed on this file
    • Fixes done by
  7. 6

    Decide the outcome

    Week 3

    Quality partner · Team

    Read the findings and the response, confirm the rating and agree the actions, each with an owner and a date.

    Checklist

    • Response considered
    • Rating confirmed
    • Every action has an owner and a date

    Fields to fill in

    • Final rating (required)
    • Agreed actions (required)

    Approval: The review is not closed until the quality partner confirms the rating and the actions.

  8. 7

    Fix the file

    Week 4

    Preparer · Team

    Make the agreed fixes on this file and record where they are.

    Checklist

    • Agreed fixes made
    • Reviewer told

    Fields to fill in

    • Link to the corrected working papers
  9. 8

    Record the lessons for the team

    Week 4

    Quality partner · Team

    Add findings that keep coming back to the firm's checklists or training plan, so the next files do not repeat them.

    Checklist

    • Checklist updated where needed
    • Training topic added where needed

    Fields to fill in

    • Lessons for the team (required)
  10. Done when

    The file is reviewed and rated, the preparer has responded, the agreed fixes are done, and any lessons are added to the checklists or training.

Make it yours. Rename steps, change owners and add checklist items, fields or approvals. The template is a starting point for the way your team works.

The AI agents in this template

An agent only works on its own steps, and a person on your team checks what it did. Anything an agent writes to a connected app waits for approval unless you allow it.

  • Findings writer

    Turns the reviewer's findings into a short, factual report for the preparer.

    What it does

    • Reads the findings, the rating and the engagement details on the run
    • Follows the report format in its step instructions
    • Writes the draft report into its step

    Checked by: The reviewer corrects the report in step 4 before it goes to the preparer.

How AI agents work in OKiDO

Questions this template answers

Review a sample of completed files each quarter, with a reviewer who did not work on them. Step 1 picks the file and assigns an independent reviewer, and step 2 reviews it against the firm's checklist for that engagement type.

Check the same things on every file: engagement terms, client acceptance, working papers and sign-offs. Step 2 holds that checklist and records each finding with its severity and the fix asked for.

Ask for a written response to each finding and agree the actions with a date. In step 5 the preparer responds, step 6 is an approval gate where the quality partner agrees the actions, and step 7 records the fixes.

Let AI turn the reviewer's notes into a clear report, and have the reviewer check it before it goes out. In step 3 the findings writer drafts the report, and in step 4 the reviewer corrects it and sends it to the preparer.

Keep the checklist, the findings, the response and the decision together for every review. Each run records who reviewed the file, the rating and the agreed actions, and step 6 records the quality partner's sign-off with name and time.

Look for findings that come back across files, and change the checklist or the training plan. Step 8 records the lessons and whether the checklist or the training was updated.

Run this workflow in OKiDO

Set up the steps, owners and approvals once, then start a run for every new case.